Toward a Built Environment that Supports Brain Health
- Ana Angulo
- Jul 4
- 3 min read

Preventing Cognitive Decline: A Community Challenge
The article “De cabeza está muy bien” (“All Good in the Head”) by Varela (2025) emphasizes that cognitive decline is not an inevitable consequence of aging, and that several functions—such as semantic memory and emotional regulation—can actually improve with age.
Likewise, the Lancet Commission (Rodríguez, 2024) identifies up to 14 modifiable factors (sedentarism, smoking, obesity, hypertension, hearing/vision loss, social isolation...) which, if addressed early, could prevent nearly half of dementia cases.
To age well, medical or personal strategies are not enough: we need environments that promote healthy, active, connected and stimulating lifestyles.
Neuroarchitecture: Strategic Principles
Neuroarchitecture studies how spaces affect our emotions, cognition, and well-being. To support healthy brain aging, I propose four key design pillars:
a) Continuous Cognitive Stimulation
Flexible zones for learning and play: Spaces with books, board games, puzzles, and materials for intergenerational workshops. These environments promote problem-solving, learning, and social interaction—essential to building cognitive reserve.
Art and music rooms: Spaces for painting, group singing, or playing instruments. As highlighted in El País, group activities like choirs, theater, and games are effective for memory stimulation.
b) Active and Interconnected Mobility
Safe, pedestrian-friendly streets: Well-lit walkways with ergonomic furniture (benches, handrails) and soft slopes encourage daily walks, helping to prevent sedentary behavior and hypertension.
Greenways and biophilic circuits: Parks and landscaped walking paths that support circulation, reduce stress, and strengthen cardiovascular health—a key to maintaining brain volume.
c) Environments That Protect the Senses
Visual and acoustic control: Reduce noise pollution, incorporate vegetation, and use absorbent materials to facilitate conversation and minimize cognitive overload.
Easy access to sensory screenings: Neighborhood health clinics offering vision and hearing check-ups to detect and correct sensory deficits—critical for prevention.
d) Social Connectivity and Belonging
Public plazas and housing with shared spaces: Porches, multipurpose rooms, cafés, and cultural events foster social interaction, reduce isolation, and lower the risk of depression.
Intergenerational community programs: Activities involving children, teens, and older adults—like book clubs, gardening, or team sports—strengthen social cohesion and motivation to stay mentally active.
Practical Design Applications
Element | Application | Cognitive Benefit |
Community library-coffee | Intellectual and emotional stimulation | Strengthens cognitive reserve |
Pathways with pace sensors | Combines physical activity with biofeedback | Reduces sedentarism, supports vascular health |
Therapeutic gardens | Vegetation for rest and social interaction | Lowers stress, improves attention |
Inclusive street furniture | Benches with backrests and shade | Encourages outdoor presence and movement |
Health modules | Routine vision/hearing check-ups | Early correction of sensory deficits |
Integrating Neuroarchitecture into Neighborhoods and Housing
Multisensory design: Natural lighting, soft colors, tactile textures, and calming scents stimulate perception and emotional well-being (Salingaros, 2006).
Circular zoning: Buildings with central courtyards and connected paths promote exploration, casual encounters, and a strong sense of community.
Progressive adaptability: Homes designed for long-term aging, including ramps, handrails, and universal-access bathrooms.
Conclusion
Cognitive aging is not just about genes or medication—it is the result of active, social, stimulating and sensorially enriched lives (Dilani, 2001). Scientific data shows that the built environment can:
Reduce dementia risk by up to 45% when paired with healthy lifestyle changes (World Health Organization, 2020).
Strengthen cognitive reserve through lifelong learning, mobility, and social connection.
The real challenge is to design neighborhoods and housing that—not only meet functional needs—but become active promoters of brain health through neuroarchitectural principles.
References
1. Varela, M. (2025, junio 16). De cabeza está muy bien: cómo evitar el deterioro cognitivo al envejecer. El País. https://elpais.com/salud-y-bienestar/2025-06-16/de-cabeza-esta-muy-bien-como-evitar-el-deterioro-cognitivo-al-envejecer.html
2. Rodríguez, M. (2024, agosto 1). Los 14 factores de riesgo a evitar que, según la ciencia, podrían esquivar casi la mitad de las demencias. El País. https://elpais.com/ciencia/2024-08-01/los-14-factores-de-riesgo-a-evitar-que-segun-la-ciencia-podrian-esquivar-casi-la-mitad-de-las-demencias.html
3. Stern, Y. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8(3), 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617702813248
4. Salingaros, N. A. (2006). Principles of Urban Structure. Techne Press.
5. Dilani, A. (2001). Psychosocially supportive design: A salutogenic approach to the design of the physical environment. Design and Health Scientific Review, 1(1), 91–96.
6. Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. W. W. Norton & Company.
7. World Health Organization. (2020). Risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia: WHO guidelines. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/risk-reduction-of-cognitive-decline-and-dementia














I hope this time you dont delete my comment ...Neuroarchitecture is not recognised as a real science by any of the established academic disciplines from which it borrows. Architecture and urban design regard it as an applied design trend rather than a formal discipline, since design practice already takes into account human perception, comfort and well-being without the need for a separate “neuro” label. Neuroscience itself does not recognise neuroarchitecture as a subfield: neuroscientists carry out rigorous studies on brain function, but they do not consider the translation of those results directly into architectural guidelines to constitute a scientific discipline in its own right. Likewise, psychology—particularly environmental psychology, which has studied human responses to environments for decades—does not see neuroarchitecture as an…